Alibabacoin (ABBC) Foundation filed a response to Alibaba Group’s complaint, refuting any intentional breach of rights.
Last week, ETHNews reported[1] that Chinese e-commerce megacompany Alibaba Group Holding filed a trademark lawsuit against Dubai's Alibabacoin (ABBC) Foundation, which is in the second phase of an ICO, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Shortly thereafter, a temporary restraining order was issued against ABBC, which was also ordered to explain why it should not be prohibited from using the name Alibaba in the United States.
The Arabian startup's legal team has since shared its official response with ETHNews, which states that demands for its client to cease business and start over with a new name is "neither a reasonable or proportionate response" to the "entirely legitimate use of an inherently generic word which emanates not from China, but indeed from the very region" that ABBC operates from.
Many readers will be familiar with the centuries-old Middle Eastern tale, "Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves."
The response maintained that the word "Alibaba" isn't owned by any "entity or individual," and that "a quick internet search reveals a dozen businesses operating in Dubai using the name Alibaba."
A notice has also appeared on ABBC's ICO website, clarifying that the two companies are not related and warning that participation in ICOs may be prohibited in some areas.
Source[2]
Additionally, ABBC's response said it is not "infringing any rights of Alibaba Group Holding and it is not issuing any coins neither collecting any monies from such coins in the UAE." It further states that it has not "acted outside the licensed activities" that were authorized by the UAE.
Finally, ABBC denied that its actions had ever indicated the intention to
